Over $150,000,000 Collected *

Call For A Free Consultation
24 Hours • 7 Days


Do You Have A Case?

Should You Settle?

"Put A Fighter In
Your Corner!"

Over 25 Years of Legal Expertise

Donald Stevenson, Esq.

Innocent Man Still Behind Bars

Call A Free Consultation
24 Hours - 7 Days


$12,650,000 Recent Settlement

$8,000,000 Recent Settlement

Our Mission Statement

Real Reviews - Real Results

Innocent Man Still Behind Bars

Posted on August 20, 2012 | Written By: iadminlaw

Some legal experts say that it’s better to let 100 guilty people go free than to put one innocent person behind bars. What if there already is an innocent person behind bars with 100 guilty people?

The fiancée and supporters of a man they say has wrongly served nearly 14 years in prison will present more than 90,000 signatures to the California Attorney General’s office Monday, hoping to apply pressure for the man’s release.


The Justices of the United States Supreme Cour...

The Justices of the United States Supreme Court with President George W. Bush, October 2005 (Photo credit: Wikipedia)


Daniel Larsen was sentenced to 27 years to life under California’s three-strikes law, after a judge found Larsen guilty of possession of a concealed weapon in 1999. But in 2010, a federal judge declared Larsen innocent and reversed his conviction. The judge said Larsen’s attorney was incompetent and that Larsen never received constitutionally fair representation.

Supporters, including the California Innocence Project, have been fighting for his release. On Monday, Larsen’s fiancée, Christina Combs, as well as Bryan Banks, the NFL hopeful who was exonerated earlier this year after spending five years in prison, plan to hold a rally to raise awareness about Larsen’s plight.

The California Attorney General’s office has appealed the federal judge’s ruling on grounds that Larsen never deserved a reversal in federal court because he missed his deadline for filing a writ of habeas corpus, which should have been filed within a year of his sentencing.

“And meanwhile Danny is rotting in prison,” said Jan Stiglitz, co-director of the California Innocence Project.

On a June night in 1998, police officers responded to a call that shots had been fired outside of the Gold Apple Bar in Los Angeles. Officers reported that they saw Larsen toss a knife underneath a nearby car. A subsequent search turned up a six-inch double-edged knife. A jury later found Larsen guilty of being an ex-felon in possession of a weapon -– he had two prior felonies for burglary.

But the California Innocence Project dug up witnesses who contradicted that story, including a former law enforcement official who said he stood within five feet of Larsen and saw another man throw the knife under the car.

Stiglitz said Larsen’s attorney never carried out basic procedures -– like hire an investigator to find witnesses who could have proved or raised doubt that he was carrying a weapon.

“If he had done his work and contacted these witnesses,” Stiglitz said of Larsen’s attorney, “then he would have been able to prove that Danny hadn’t thrown the knife under the car.”

By the time these witnesses were brought to the Innocence Project, the deadline for filing the writ of habeas corpus had passed.

Stiglitz said Larsen shouldn’t be held in prison because of a legal technicality, especially after a federal judge reversed his sentence.

The attorney general’s office did not return calls seeking comment.

If a loved one was the victim of wrongful incarceration that was caused by negligence or some other form of reckless behavior, it is important that you contact a committed and dedicated personal injury lawyer to help you decide if you should file a lawsuit. A competent and reputable injury lawyer can help you receive the compensation you deserve for your pain and suffering.

News Service Disclaimer: i Accident Lawyer provides this news service to keep you informed about accidents and events happening in and around your community. The information in these articles is obtained from a variety of secondary sources including press releases by law enforcement, websites, and news reports. This material is for general information only and its accuracy cannot be guaranteed; for complete details about a given event or accident you should refer to an official police report. i Accident Lawyer may not represent the parties mentioned in these news articles. If you have been injured in the reported news article and you need our help please call, we can help you. The articles are for informational purposes only. Our law firm has been helping victims of serious injuries and their families for over 30 years. Call us for a free, no obligation consultation.

Lawyer Advertising. This website is designed for general information only, and in no way is intended to constitute legal advice nor the formation of a lawyer/client relationship without a signed, written agreement. Testimonials or endorsements do not constitute a guarantee, warranty, or prediction regarding the outcome of your legal matter. You pay no fees or costs unless we recover for you. This website contains dramatizations. Prior results are not a guarantee of a future outcome. i Accident Lawyer does not accept all cases and works cooperatively with co-counsel and/or other law firms with whom it has joint agreements who might potentially handle your cases. We look forward to helping you with your claim.